The Global Sustainable Competitiveness Index
The Global Sustainable Competitiveness Index (GSCI) measures competitiveness of countries in an integrated way. It is calculated based on 111 measurable, quantitative indicators derived from reliable sources, such as the World Bank, the IMF, and different UN agencies.the 111 indicators are grouped into 5 sub-indexes - Natural Capital, Resource Efficiency & Intensity, Intellectual Capital, Governance Efficiency, and Social Cohesion. More details on the methodology are available here.
Natural Capital: the given natural environment, including the availability of resources, and the level of the depletion of those resources.
Social Capital: health, security, freedom, equality and life satisfaction within a country.
Resource Management: the efficiency of using available resources as a measurement of operational competitiveness in a resource-constraint World.
Intellectual Capital: the capability to generate wealth and jobs through innovation and value-added industries in the globalised markets
Governance Efficiency: Results of core state areas and investments – infrastructure, market and employment structure, the provision of a framework for sustained and sustainable wealth generation
The Sustainable Competitiveness Index 2017
The Sustainable Competiveness Ranking 2017 is dominated by European nations:
- Of the top twenty nations only three are not European – New Zealand on 13, South Korea on 16, and Japan on 20.
- Scandinavia covers the top 5 ranks. Sweden is leading the Sustainable Competitiveness – followed by the other 4 the Scandinavian nations.
- The top 20 are dominated by Northern European countries, including the Baltic states and Slovenia
- Germany ranks 14, the UK 22, and the World’s largest economy, the US, is ranked 29. The US ranks particularly low in resource efficiency, but also social capital - undermining the global status of the US in the future
- Of the large emerging economies (BRICs), China is ranked 32, Brazil 42, Russia 43, and India 121.
- Some of the least developed nations have a considerable higher GSCI ranking than their GDP would suggest (e.g. Laos, Timor, Burma, Bhutan, Suriname…)
- Asian nations (South Korea, Japan, Singapore, and China) lead the Intellectual Capital ranking. However, achieving sustained prosperity in these countries might be compromised by Natural Capital constraints and current high resource intensity/low resource efficiency
- The Social Cohesion ranking is headed by Northern European (Scandinavian) countries, indicating that Social Cohesion is the result of economic growth combined with social consensus
- Sovereign bond ratings do not take into account the underlying sustainability factors; they only describe symptoms, not causes. It is high time that credit ratings do take into account the basis of sustained wealth, because sovereign credit ratings do not fully reflect investor risks.
The Global Competitiveness Report 2017 (PDF, 58 pages)
Dark areas indicate high sustainable competitiveness, lighter shades lower competitiveness
Sustainable Competitiveness Rankings
The Global Sustainable Competitiveness index is a purely non-commercial project - i.e. does not generate any income. The reason we keep doing this is because sometimes we receive emails like this one:
"My sincere congratulations for pulling together, once again, critical information in a compelling manner. It is to be hoped that policy makers everywhere will read the report."
Former Executive Director, UN Global Compact