Do sovereign credit ratings fully reflect investor risks?
Sovereign risk ratings –commonly referred to as credit rating - determines the level of interest a country has to pay for loans and credits. It is therefore a very important parameter for every economy – it defines the level of capital cost for new investments, whatever the nature of those investment may be. The credit rating also affects the risks an investor is willing to take in overseas investments. Sovereign risk ratings are calculated by a number of rating agencies, most notable (and defining) by the “three sisters”: Moody’s S&P, and Fitch. The publications and ratings of these three companies therefore have a significant impact on the cost of capital of a specific country.
Sustainablility-adjusted credit ratings
Sovereign risks are calculated based on a mix of economic, political and financial risks – i.e. all current risks that, like GDP calculations, do not take into account the framework that enables and defines the current situation. They do not look at or consider the wider environment – the ability and motivation of the workforce, the health and well-being, the physical environment (natural and man-made) that have caused the current situation. Credit ratings describe symptoms, they do not look at the root causes. It is therefore questionable whether credit ratings truly reflect investor risks of investing in a specific country.
Credit ratings describe symptoms, they do not look at the root causes.
List of upgrades and downgrades of individual countries: the USA, UK and Australia all would be downgraded several levels, while in South America, Eastern Europe and Central Africa most nations receive a credit rating upgrade
Sustainabilty-adjusted credit ratings of selected countries
Read more in the Global Sustainable Competitiveness Report
Download Sovereign bonds and sustainability
Why the Global Sustainable Competitiveness Report is superior to the WEF Competitiveness Report:
Download Sustainable Competitiveness Vs. WEF Competitiveness